eñä te 'bhihitä säìkhye
buddhir yoge tv imäà çåëu
buddhyä yukto yayä pärtha
karma-bandhaà prahäsyasi
SYNONYMS
eñä-all this; te-unto you; abhihitä-described; säìkhye-by
analytical study; buddhiù-intelligence; yoge-in work without fruitive
result; tu-but; imäm-this; çåëu-just hear; buddhyä-by
intelligence; yuktaù-dovetailed; yayä-by which; pärtha-O son of
Påthä; karma-bandham-bondage of reaction; prahäsyasi-you can be released
from.
TRANSLATION
Thus far I have described this knowledge to you through analytical study. Now listen as
I explain it in terms of working without fruitive results. O son of Påthä, when you act
in such knowledge you can free yourself from the bondage of works.
PURPORT
According to the Nirukti, or the Vedic dictionary, saìkhyä means that
which describes things in detail, and säìkhya refers to that philosophy which
describes the real nature of the soul. And yoga involves controlling the senses.
Arjuna's proposal not to fight was based on sense gratification. Forgetting his prime
duty, he wanted to cease fighting, because he thought that by not killing his relatives
and kinsmen he would be happier than by enjoying the kingdom after conquering his cousins
and brothers, the sons of Dhåtaräñöra. In both ways, the basic principles were for
sense gratification. Happiness derived from conquering them and happiness derived by
seeing kinsmen alive are both on the basis of personal sense gratification, even at a
sacrifice of wisdom and duty. Kåñëa, therefore, wanted to explain to Arjuna that by
killing the body of his grandfather he would not be killing the soul proper, and He
explained that all individual persons, including the Lord Himself, are eternal
individuals; they were individuals in the past, they are individuals in the present, and
they will continue to remain individuals in the future, because all of us are individual
souls eternally. We simply change our bodily dress in different manners, but actually we
keep our individuality even after liberation from the bondage of material dress. An
analytical study of the soul and the body has been very graphically explained by Lord
Kåñëa. And this descriptive knowledge of the soul and the body from different angles of
vision has been described here as Säìkhya, in terms of the Nirukti dictionary.
This Säìkhya has nothing to do with Säìkhya philosophy of the atheist Kapila. Long
before the imposter Kapila's Säìkhya, the Säìkhya philosophy was expounded in the Çrémad-Bhägavatam
by the true Lord Kapila, the incarnation of Lord Kåñëa, who explained it to His mother,
Devahüti. It is clearly explained by Him that the puruña, or the Supreme Lord, is
active and that He creates by looking over the prakåti. This is accepted in the Vedas
and in the Gétä. The description in the Vedas indicates that the Lord
glanced over the prakåti, or nature, and impregnated it with atomic individual
souls. All these individuals are working in the material world for sense gratification,
and under the spell of material energy they are thinking of being enjoyers. This mentality
is dragged to the last point of liberation when the living entity wants to become one with
the Lord. This is the last snare of mäyä, or sense gratificatory illusion, and it
is only after many, many births of such sense gratificatory activities that a great soul
surrenders unto Väsudeva, Lord Kåñëa, thereby fulfilling the search after the ultimate
truth.
Arjuna has already accepted Kåñëa as his spiritual master by surrendering himself
unto Him: çiñyas te 'haà çädhi mäà tväà prapannam. Consequently, Kåñëa
will now tell him about the working process in buddhi-yoga, or karma-yoga,
or in other words, the practice of devotional service only for the sense gratification of
the Lord. This buddhi-yoga is clearly explained in Chapter Ten, verse ten, as being
direct communion with the Lord, who is sitting as Paramätmä in everyone's heart. But
such communion does not take place without devotional service. One who is therefore
situated in devotional or transcendental loving service to the Lord, or, in other words,
in Kåñëa consciousness, attains to this stage of buddhi-yoga by the special
grace of the Lord. The Lord says, therefore, that only to those who are always engaged in
devotional service out of transcendental love does He award the pure knowledge of devotion
in love. In that way the devotee can reach Him easily in the ever-blissful kingdom of God.
Thus the buddhi-yoga mentioned in this verse is the devotional service of the
Lord, and the word Säìkhya mentioned herein has nothing to do with the atheistic säìkhya-yoga
enunciated by the imposter Kapila. One should not, therefore, misunderstand that the säìkhya-yoga
mentioned herein has any connection with the atheistic Säìkhya. Nor did that philosophy
have any influence during that time; nor would Lord Kåñëa care to mention such godless
philosophical speculations. Real Säìkhya philosophy is described by Lord Kapila in the Çrémad-Bhägavatam,
but even that Säìkhya has nothing to do with the current topics. Here, Säìkhya means
analytical description of the body and the soul. Lord Kåñëa made an analytical
description of the soul just to bring Arjuna to the point of buddhi-yoga, or bhakti-yoga.
Therefore, Lord Kåñëa's Säìkhya and Lord Kapila's Säìkhya, as described in the Bhägavatam,
are one and the same. They are all bhakti-yoga. Lord Kåñëa Said, therefore, that
only the less intelligent class of men make a distinction between säìkhya-yoga
and bhakti-yoga (säìkhya-yogau påthag bäläù pravadanti na paëòitäù).
Of course, atheistic säìkhya-yoga has nothing to do with bhakti-yoga,
yet the unintelligent claim that the atheistic säìkhya-yoga is referred to in the
Bhagavad-gétä.
One should therefore understand that buddhi-yoga means to work in Kåñëa
consciousness, in the full bliss and knowledge of devotional service. One who works for
the satisfaction of the Lord only, however difficult such work may be, is working under
the principles of buddhi-yoga and finds himself always in transcendental bliss. By
such transcendental engagement, one achieves all transcendental understanding
automatically, by the grace of the Lord, and thus his liberation is complete in itself,
without his making extraneous endeavors to acquire knowledge. There is much difference
between work in Kåñëa consciousness and work for fruitive results, especially in the
matter of sense gratification for achieving results in terms of family or material
happiness. Buddhi-yoga is therefore the transcendental quality of the work that we
perform.